Comparison of four immobilization methods for different transaminases

“Biocatalytic syntheses often require unfavorable conditions, which can adversely affect enzyme stability. Consequently, improving the stability of biocatalysts is needed, and this is often achieved by immobilization. In this study, we aimed to compare the stability of soluble and immobilized transaminases from different species. A cysteine in a consensus sequence was converted to a single aldehyde by the formylglycine-generating enzyme for directed single-point attachment to amine beads. This immobilization was compared to cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) and multipoint attachments to glutaraldehyde-functionalized amine- and epoxy-beads. Subsequently, the reactivity and stability (i.e., thermal, storage, and solvent stability) of all soluble and immobilized transaminases were analyzed and compared under different conditions. The effect of immobilization was highly dependent on the type of enzyme, the immobilization strategy, and the application itself, with no superior immobilization technique identified. Immobilization of HAGA-beads often resulted in the highest activities of up to 62 U/g beads, and amine beads were best for the hexameric transaminase from Luminiphilus syltensis. Furthermore, the immobilization of transaminases enabled its reusability for at least 10 cycles, while maintaining full or high activity. Upscaled kinetic resolutions (partially performed in a SpinChem™ reactor) resulted in a high conversion, maintained enantioselectivity, and high product yields, demonstrating their applicability.”

Highlights:

• “The reaction catalyzed by ATA-Lsy, immobilized on HA-beads, was performed in a SpinChem rotating bed reactor, which allows easy scaling by changing the reactor and/or vessel size […]”
• “Upscaled kinetic resolutions resulted in a high conversion, maintained enantioselectivity, and high product yields, demonstrating their applicability.”