Biocatalysis is the use of enzymes and occasionally other biological molecules to catalyze chemical reactions. It is used in a wide range of applications, including the production of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, flavoring agents, or food and beverages.
One of the main advantages of biocatalysis is its ability to highly selectively catalyze reactions under mild conditions, such as at moderate temperatures and pH values. This makes it a more environmentally friendly and intrinsically safer alternative than traditional chemical synthesis.
In addition to its environmental benefits, biocatalysis can also offer economic advantages, such as lower production costs and the ability to synthesize complex molecules that are difficult to access by other methods. These factors make biocatalysis an attractive option for many industries.
Some specific examples for applications of biocatalysis include the production of enzymes for laundry detergents, the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, and the production of biofuels.
Enzymes display remarkable chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity. The identification of a suitable enzyme that converts the mandated substrate to the desired product isomer, allows to significantly shorten reaction pathways compared to traditional multistep synthesis. Notably, protection and deprotection strategies can often be omitted, and difficult isomer separation may be avoided.
The mild conditions and modest temperatures employed in enzymatic reactions, in combination with the highly selective catalysis, typically result in few to no significant side reactions.
Additionally, environmental and toxicological benefits can be reaped by avoiding pathways that employ metal catalysts and hazardous reagents.
Enzymes are divided into seven classes according to the type of reaction they catalyze.
EC 1 - Oxidoreductases catalyze oxidation-reduction reactions, hence involving the transfer of electrons from one molecule to another.
EC 2 - Transferases catalyze the transfer of certain groups from one molecule to another.
EC 3 - Hydrolases catalyze the hydrolysis of various bonds.
EC 4 - Lyases catalyze the cleavage of various bonds by means other than hydrolysis, often forming a double bond or a new ring structure.
EC 5 - Isomerases catalyze the rearrangement of atoms within a molecule to form a structural isomer.
EC 6 - Ligases catalyze the formation of a new chemical bond, facilitated by the concommitant consumption of a high-energy cosubstrate.
EC 7 - Translocases facilitate the movement of ions or molecules across membranes or their separation within membranes.
The activity and stability of enzymes are governed by several factors, including temperature, pH, solvent type or buffer conditions, water activity, immobilization, stirring, and reaction parameters. Understanding these factors allows us to optimize enzyme-catalyzed reactions and to improve their efficiency and effectiveness.
TemperatureEnzymes are subject to two competing processes: On the one hand an increase in temperature raises the catalytic turnover according to Arrhenius, and on the other hand it accelerates the breakdown of the enzyme. The combined result is a bell-shaped temperature-activity curve, i.e., enzymes have a specific optimal temperature with peak productivity flanked by diminishing returns at both higher and lower temperatures.
Enzymes are frequently engineered to shift the temperature range of optimal activity and to thereby make them more resistant to denaturation. The desired shift in temperature can be both to higher and lower temperatures to either allow for reactions at elevated temperatures or to ensure high activity even at low temperatures. Enzymes can also be engineered to allow for a broadened substrate scope or non-natural substrates and products. Finally, engineering may confer stability in non-conventional media.
pHSimilar to temperature dependence, enzymes show peak activity within a narrow pH range. When moving away from the optimal pH, the activity is diminished and finally lost. Consequently, some form of pH control is often necessary.
Solvent/bufferChoice of buffer and buffer strength may provide pH control and stability in aqueous systems and consequently also determine activity and stability. In non-conventional solvents, pH effects are defined by the interplay of physicochemical properties of substrates, products, and the reaction medium. This may go so far as to render these effects completely void. However, solvents themselves may have a strong impact on enzyme stability and activity. If necessary, process analytical technology (PAT) and titration allow for active pH control in any case. Choice of solvent also strongly affects the enzymatic activity.
Water activityEnzymes require a minimum amount of water to sustain their catalytic function. This is typically due to the need for structurally-bound water and becomes important for reactions in non-aqueous media. However, the share of water required is frequently less than 1% of the total reaction medium. As a consequence - and perhaps counter-intuitively - a small amount of water is also added to reactions that from a thermodynamic perspective should ideally be 'water-free' (i.e., condensation reactions).
ImmobilizationImmobilization of free enzymes onto solid materials (enzyme carriers) often provides stabilization and thereby prolonged lifetime of the enzyme. However, it also affects enzymatic activity whereby an increase is the more desirable yet less prevalent result. The success of the immobilization is strongly defined by the compatibility between enzyme and enzyme carrier material, and trials with several different materials are advisable. Arguably, the most common enzyme carrier materials are synthetic polymers (resins), but inorganic materials such as glass, natural fibers, etc. are also used and bio-based organic alternatives gain traction as well. The final choice is typically based on overall catalytic productivity.
Inherently connected to the enzyme carrier material is the method of attachment. While some enzymes, notably lipases, may be attached non-covalently by hydrophobic interactions, covalent attachment is often needed. The chemistries used hereby are versatile and frequently react nucleophilic free amines or thiols from the enzyme surface with electrophilic reactive groups (epoxides, aldehydes) on the carrier surface. The exact choice of attachment strategy will definitely affect the catalytic properties of the obtained heterogenous biocatalyst preparation.
Read more in our insight 'Introduction to Enzyme Immobilization'.
MixingIn the case of industrially preferred immobilized enzymes, the method of mixing determines the longevity of the heterogeneous catalyst. For batch reactors, the rotating bed reactor offers almost complete protection against the grinding effects that standard stirred tank reactors suffer from. As a result, extended recycling becomes feasible and convenient.
A rotating bed reactor (RBR) is designed to prevent disintegration of solid phase particles by retaining them inside a rotating cylinder during the reaction. This minimizes solid phase debris even at high speeds, which would normally occur due to mechanical forces when using stirred tank reactors. Due to this characteristic of the RBR, reaction rates can be improved by increasing the stirring speed without simultaneously shortening the lifespan of the solid particles. This ensures easy in-line monitoring of the process, as well as a more efficient recycling of the solid phase, making the RBR a cost and time efficient alternative to conventional methods for immobilized enzyme biocatalysis.
Reaction parametersPerhaps more related to the efficiency of the enzymatic reaction than the stability of the enzyme are parameters such as reagent stoichiometry, gas introduction method, and the minimization of temperature or concentration gradients. Proper mixing ensures the necessary mass transfer of all substrates to the enzyme and is crucial especially in three-phase reactions where saturation with gaseous reagents has to be considered as well. Here too, the RBR provides important advantages over stirred tank reactors.
Don't miss out on the exciting developments in biocatalysis! With engineered enzymes that are more stable, more active, and capable of working in a wider range of conditions, biocatalysis is becoming increasingly accessible and easy to use. And with a growing range of free and immobilized enzymes available on the market, now is the perfect time to start exploring the benefits of biocatalysis for yourself. - Join the biocatalysis revolution today!
Katarzyna Szymańska, Klaudia Odrozek, Aurelia Zniszczoł, Wojciech Pudło, and Andrzej B. Jarzębski Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 315, pp. 18-24.
Immobilized biocatalysis is the application of enzymes bound to solid supports, where they act as catalysts facilitating a chemical reaction. Traditionally, this process has been performed in stirred tank reactors or fixed bed reactors. The stirred tank will quickly destroy the solid support, leading to loss of catalysts and fouling of the product. Although the fixed bed (also known as column) circumvents this problem, it still suffers the challenge of severe pressure buildup which often makes deployment impossible at scale.
Roger A. Sheldon and Pedro C. Pereira Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46(10), pp. 2678-2691.
Enzyme screening is an important step in the development of a biocatalytic application. The behaviour of the biocatalyst is often hard to predict, meaning that different combinations of materials and reaction conditions need to be tested.
Philipp Petermeier, Jan Philipp Bittner, Simon Müller, Emil Byström, and Selin Kara Green Chemistry, 2022, 24(18), pp. 6889-6899.
When working with an emulsion (and particularly with a heterogeneous catalyst) the mass transfer between the phases is critical. Insufficient mixing leads to lower interfacial area per volume, and in turn to poor mass transfer across the phases.
Hendrik Mallin, Jan Muschiol, Emil Byström, and Uwe T. Bornscheuer ChemCatChem, 2013, 5, pp. 3529-3532.
Whole cell biocatalysis is powerful, but not straightforward. One way of utilizing whole cells is to encapsulate them in a matrix such as alginate to make them easier to separate from a reaction mixture. However, alginate beads are not mechanically stable enough to be packed into columns and are easily destroyed in stirred tank reactors (STR). This makes enzyme recycling ineffective, at the same time as mass transfer limitations may prevail.
Finding the optimal chemistry and solid-phase material for immobilization of enzymes relies heavily on trial and error. The right resin will ensure satisfactory immobilization yield, as well as high activity and stability of the enzyme.
Ariana Causevic, Eimantas Gladkauskas, Kim Olofsson, Patrick Adlercreutz, and Carl Grey Biochem. Eng. J., 2022, 187, 108610.
Anup Ashok and Santhosh Kumar Devarai 3 Biotech, 2019, 9(9), 349.
Carl-Johan Aurell, Staffan Karlsson, Fritiof Pontén, and Søren M. Andersen Org. Process Res. Dev., 2014, 18(9), pp. 1116-1119.
Jochen Wachtmeister, Philip Mennicken, Andreas Hunold, and Dörte Rother ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, pp. 607-614.
Jens Johannsen, Francesca Meyer, Claudia Engelmann, Andreas Liese, Georg Fieg, Paul Bubenheim, and Thomas Waluga AIChE J., 2021, 67(4), e17158.
Roger A. Sheldon, Alessandra Basso, and Dean Brady Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50(10), pp. 5850-5862.
Oliver Fellechner and Irina Smirnova Can. J. Chem. Eng., 2021, 99, pp. 1035-1049.
Alexandra V. Chatzikonstantinou, Αrchontoula Giannakopoulou, Stamatia Spyrou, Yannis V. Simos, Vassiliki G. Kontogianni, Dimitrios Peschos, Petros Katapodis, Angeliki C. Polydera, and Haralambos Stamatis Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2022, 29, pp. 29624-29637.
S. Lokesha, Y. S. Ravi Kumar, P. S. Sujan Ganapathy, Prashant Gaur, and H. M. Arjun 3 Biotech, 2021, 11, 410.
Ingeborg Heuschkel, Selina Hanisch, Daniel C. Volke, Erik Löfgren, Anna Hoschek, Pablo I. Nikel, Rohan Karande, and Katja Bühler Eng. Life Sci., 2021, 21(3-4), pp. 258-269.
M. Aßmann, A. Stöbener, C. Mügge, S. K. Gaßmeyer, L. Hilterhaus, R. Kourist, A. Liese, and S. Kara React. Chem. Eng., 2017, 2(4), pp. 531-540.
Jochen Wachtmeister and Dörte Rother Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2016, 42, pp. 169-177.
Investigating reactions can easily grow from an idea into very time-consuming projects, but the upside of properly understanding the reaction is great. The choice of equipment has a very large impact on the efforts required. The rotating bed reactor is a tool that unlocks the full potential of your Mettler-Toledo EasyMax™ 102 Advanced synthesis workstation for this development.
Roger A. Sheldon and John M. Woodley Chem. Rev., 2018, 118(2), pp. 801-838.
This case study presents a lipase-mediated stereoselective acetylation of a racemic amine in a rotating bed reactor.
Stirred vessels tend to damage soft heterogeneous catalysts, like enzymes immobilized in agarose or alginate beads, with activity loss and tedious workup as consequence. In a fixed bed reactor, these materials are easily compressed by the pressure gradient, leading to a loss of flow rate. Overcoming these challenges opens up the possibility to use biocatalysis as a tool for greener processes and more sustainable manufacturing.
Screening immobilized enzymes to find the best match with the substrate and reaction conditions can be a time-consuming process. The introduction of the solids in a stirred tank reactor leads to damage to the immobilized biocatalysts and makes filtration necessary.
The SpinChem rotating bed reactor (RBR) has been proven to be a time and labor-efficient tool in the screening of biocatalysts. Here, we present the quick simultaneous screening of six different immobilized lipases for the esterification of lauric acid to propyl laurate using our pre-packed MagRBR lipase screening kit.
Research and development quickly takes new directions, and the requirements on a laboratory may vary with every new project. Limiting yourself to equipment with a narrow scope of conditions and applications may become expensive, since new equipment must be acquired for anything out of scope. With budgets quickly consumed by other projects, the need for new equipment may mean significant delays and a reduced capability to take on emerging opportunities.
The synthesis of products, such as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), often involves multiple steps using heterogeneous catalysts or adsorbents. Thus, the simultaneous use of multiple solid phases either during synthesis or downstream processing is frequently highly advantageous.
Synthesis typically involves multiple reaction steps and the isolation of intermediate products. Any incomplete conversion at the end of each step will compound to an overall lower yield. To make things worse, the work-up of each intermediate can be very time-consuming. This has made one-pot cascade synthesis (the simultaneous execution of multiple steps in a single reactor) a desirable target for chemists. This approach aims to minimize intermediate work-up, reduce the risk of material loss, and enhance overall process efficiency.
Can you use a rotating bed reactor (RBR) in any type of vessel? - Absolutely! Would the performance be higher with baffles in the vessel? - Definitely!
Subhash Pithani, Staffan Karlsson, Hans Emtenäs, and Christopher T. Öberg Org. Process Res. Dev., 2019, 23(9), pp. 1926-1931.
Shuke Wu and Zhi Li ChemCatChem, 2018, 10(10), pp. 2164-2178.
Biocatalysis offers many benefits in the production of chemicals and active pharmaceutical ingredients. One major challenge has been the deployment of immobilized enzymes in an efficient way on large scale. The rotating bed reactor offers a convenient way to scale a biocatalytic process.
Sometimes you don’t want to pack the entire rotating bed reactor full with your solid-phase material. Fully loading might simply be wasteful, or you may want to experiment with your reaction conditions. But how does the amount of solids in the rotating bed reactor influence the reaction performance? Can you use only 10% of the full capacity?
Teng Ma, Weixi Kong, Yunting Liu, Hao Zhao, Yaping Ouyang, Jing Gao, Liya Zhou, and Yanjun Jiang Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2022, 194, pp. 4999–5016.
Adriana Freites Aguilera, Pontus Lindroos, Jani Rahkila, Mark Martinez Klimov, Pasi Tolvanen, and Tapio Salmi Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., 2022, 174, 108882.
Krzysztof Polaczek, Eliza Kaulina, Ralfs Pomilovskis, Anda Fridrihsone, and Mikelis Kirpluks J. Polym. Environ., 2022, 30, pp. 4774–4786.
Markus Hobisch, Piera De Santis, Simona Serban, Alessandra Basso, Emil Byström, and Selin Kara Org. Process Res. Dev., 2022, 26(9), pp. 2761-2765.
Tobias Heinks, Nicolai Montua, Michelle Teune, Jan Liedtke, Matthias Höhne, Uwe T. Bornscheuer, and Gabriele Fischer von Mollard Catalysts, 2023, 13(2), 300.
Wilhelm Wikström, Adriana Freites Aguilera, Pasi Tolvanen, Robert Lassfolk, Ananias Medina, Kari Eränen, and Tapio Salmi Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2023, 62(23), pp. 9169-9187.
Christopher K. Prier, Karla Camacho Soto, Jacob H. Forstater, Nadine Kuhl, Jeffrey T. Kuethe, Wai Ling Cheung-Lee, Michael J. Di Maso, Claire M. Eberle, Shane T. Grosser, Hsing-I Ho, Erik Hoyt, Anne Maguire, Kevin M. Maloney, Amanda Makarewicz, Jonathan P. McMullen, Jeffrey C. Moore, Grant S. Murphy, Karthik Narsimhan, Weilan Pan, Nelo R. Rivera, Anumita Saha-Shah, David A. Thaisrivongs, Deeptak Verma, Adeya Wyatt, and Daniel Zewge ACS Catal., 2023, 13(12), pp. 7707-7714.
Daria Kowalczykiewicz, Katarzyna Szymańska, Danuta Gillner, and Andrzej B. Jarzębsk Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2021, 312, 110789.
Laura Leemans Martin, Theo Peschke, Francesco Venturoni, and Serena Mostarda Curr. Opin. Green Sustainable Chem., 2020, 25, 100350.
Robert Kourist and Javier González‐Sabín In: Biocatalysis for Practitioners: Techniques, Reactions and Applications
Roger A. Sheldon and Dean Brady ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2021, 9(24), pp. 8032–8052.
Jesús Albarrán‐Velo, Sergio González‐Granda, Marina López‐Agudo, and Vicente Gotor‐Fernández In: Biocatalysis for Practitioners: Techniques, Reactions and Applications
José Coloma, Yann Guiavarc'h, Peter-Leon Hagedoorn, and Ulf Hanefeld Catal. Sci. Technol., 2020, 10(11), pp. 3613-3621.
Silvia Donzella, Concetta Compagno, Francesco Molinari, Francesca Paradisi, and Martina Letizia React. Chem. Eng., 2023, 8(12), pp. 2963-2966.
Jessica Holtheuer, Luigi Tavernini, Claudia Bernal, Oscar Romero, Carminna Ottone, and Lorena Wilson Molecules, 2023, 28(2), 644.
Yutong Wang, Niklas Teetz, Dirk Holtmann, Miguel Alcalde, Jacob M. A. van Hengst, Xiaoxiao Liu, Mengfan Wang, Wei Qi, Wuyuan Zhang, and Frank Hollmann ChemCatChem, 2023, 15(13), e202300645.
Guillem Vernet, Markus Hobisch, and Selin Kara Curr. Opin. Green Sustainable Chem., 2022, 38, 100692.
Daniel Eggerichs, Kathrin Zilske, and Dirk Tischler Mol. Catal., 2023, 546, 113277.
Kim Shortall, Katarzyna Szymańska, Cristina Carucci, Tewfik Soulimane, and Edmond Magner In: Biocatalyst Immobilization, Foundations and Applications, 2022
Environmentally benign and safe synthesis is enabled by highly active biocatalysts. To bolster economic and ecological aspects, catalyst reuse is essential and achieved by heterogenization of otherwise soluble enzymes onto solid supports. Here, this is demonstrated on novel renewable and non-polluting cellulose beads.
The fastest way to get in to get in touch is to pick your best time below, or send us a message. We are here to help, assist and contribute with our knowledge. Looking forward to hear from you!
COO
+46 705 988 837